What type of conversation is suggested as more effective than meetings for building commitment?

Individual conversations are suggested as more effective than meetings for building commitment because they allow for personalized interactions. In an individual setting, a deeper connection can be established, fostering trust and open communication. This type of conversation enables participants to express their thoughts and concerns freely, ensuring that their perspectives are valued and understood. As a result, individuals are more likely to feel committed to the goals and outcomes discussed.

In group settings, such as brainstorming sessions or formal presentations, the dynamics often shift, and individual voices may be overshadowed or lost in the crowd. In these situations, participants might hesitate to speak up, leading to less engagement and a weaker sense of ownership over the outcomes. Individual conversations, on the other hand, cultivate an environment where commitment can grow due to the focused attention on each person's ideas and feelings. This personalized approach helps bridge any gaps and aligns individual motivations with organizational goals, greatly enhancing the likelihood of commitment.